test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Fernando

Members
  • Content count

    8,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

5 Followers

About Fernando

  • Rank
    Iron Spader
  • Birthday 01/10/1984

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location Woodhaven, NY
  • Favourite Chelsea Player Kai Havertz
  • Fan Since 2007
  • Interests Stock market, surfing, traveling and watching Chelsea matches!

Recent Profile Visitors

5,400 profile views
  1. Super Frank Thread

    No good word when winning but as soon as when no win people come out of hidding?
  2. Chelsea - Spurs

    Yeah I thought a draw was about right.
  3. Chelsea - Spurs

    I don't think we win. I will be actually surprised if we win. I'm going for a tie or a lose.
  4. Super Frank Thread

    Don't worry as soon as we lose this thread gets filled. People just love to come out of the shed when we lose for some reason.....
  5. 19. Mason Mount

    Don't worry he will be run to the ground and dip in form come January-February. Then we will hear the Lampard son comments.
  6. Rennes 1-2 Chelsea

    That's why we need Rice and give the boot to Jorginho.
  7. 11. Timo Werner

    Miss many chances, that is a bit worrying.
  8. 19. Mason Mount

    Can't pass this Mount!
  9. Rennes 1-2 Chelsea

    Running Mount to the ground and as well Werner. Not good.
  10. Politics & Stuff

    You can ask a question about free will freely in the first place. If free will did not exist then your question has no essential meaning because it's just pre determined biological processes causing sound to come out of your vocal cords.
  11. Politics & Stuff

    Truth claim = your rising above the bondage of total subjectivity. If your totally determined, your pre wire to think the way you do. So you can't make a truth statement. The moment you make a truth claim your violating determinism.
  12. Politics & Stuff

    Well I will pray for you. And no I don't believe in killing people or forcing you to change. It should never be about that because then it wouldn't be love, but a violation. Take care and have a good day.
  13. Politics & Stuff

    You did not prove anything. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Thence whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? 1. I'm not arguing for omnipotent, i'm arguing that only using that 1 rule then yes he is not omnipotent. But if you use other stuff god is love, god is all knowing, god is everlasting etc etc then you got to take each side without creating a contradiction. 2. You can argue that not willing makes he seem malevolent but we are stuck in this side of eternity that we can't see past all the angles. In nature there's some animals that must suffer in order to help develop to fly and fend for themselves. If they where to get helped they would be weak. We don't know enough to come to that conclusion 3 Whence cometh evil? I answer that but you don't want to accept, it came from Lucifer that rebelled against god. 4. And last neither able nor willing, I think my point 2 answer that.
  14. Politics & Stuff

    What is the opposite of free choice? Is it pre determined? Now let me ask you, are you free to answer that question? Are you making a truth claim?
  15. Politics & Stuff

    Those fundamental are important because you are tying disprove God based on 2 concepts of all powerful and and all good. So then I state okay let's take away God from the equation then you must answer other things that explain why God does not exist. If God does not exist then how we as evolving things got any conscious to decide what is wrong and right? So my main point was how you decided that, as far as law and what not? And you state that the modern nations do that. And laws are amended as we progress. Hence we collective decide what is good and wrong?