test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

communicate

Members
  • Content count

    4,422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

About communicate

  • Rank
    Star Player

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location USA
  • Fan Since Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,698 profile views
  1. The English Football Thread

    Better against smaller team has got nothing to do with their depth, it is how they play. Is klopp the better manager? I think so. Did pep spend far more than klopp? For sure. But you really sound like pool fans. They have been shouting that we don't buy star, we make stars
  2. The English Football Thread

    City is imo the same level as this pool team. A bit better against weaker team but worse against bigger team. Losing Laporte pretty much f them and that is understandable, it is like pool lose vvd.
  3. The English Football Thread

    He is right though. Klopp always develop players. He never broke transfer record for GK and CB.
  4. Super Frank Thread

    Define something? Should we sign another Zappacosta? Give me a name of a player that is better than ours that is attainable.
  5. 8. Ross Barkley

    Played well though against bournemouth without much playing time before
  6. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    Probably a backup striker at most
  7. 20. Callum Hudson-Odoi

    He played there for us in one game, can't remember against whom. It was early and he came as sub. He can play as no 10 no problem, he is pretty much a between the line guy
  8. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    If you think ake is wc or very to close to wc then this is a no brainer. But if you think he is just better than Christensen, I much rather spend money on clear need. We have lb problem, we have no true dm, lamp only trust one striker.
  9. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    You just answered why we don't need ake. Unless you think ake is wc then we don't need ake.
  10. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    I don't think he is forced to take Morata and Bakayoko. I am pretty sure Bakayoko was his first choice. TBF, it made sense.Two mobile destroyer sounds really2 perfect for 343. Morata on the other hand, is plan B. Conte wanted a true no 9 because he had problem wity Costa. Honestly not sure who else was available at that time, even we have problem finding no 9 right now. I also don't think any big team has signed an all arounder no 9 since then.
  11. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    Atletico won't loan us Lemar unless there is a must buy clause. Why do we need ake?
  12. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    Not really. He wanted ox and Lukaku. He got Morata and Zappacosta. I fully supported Bakayoko signing because it made sense for us. Drinkwater was because we need British midfielder.
  13. 12. Ruben Loftus-Cheek

    Mount is an am Ruben is a cm That is quite obvious if you look at the way they play
  14. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    I am not sure about Werner but it looks like he is a striker who want to run behind. CHO/Puli - Tammy - Werner Mean that Cho and Puli will need to be very2 solid defensively.
  15. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    I don't know about minamino, but it makr sense because it is quite cheap and as long as he is better than shaqiri/Lallana then it is all good.