test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

1905didierblue

Members
  • Content count

    907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    India

About 1905didierblue

  • Rank
    Reserve Team

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location England
  • Favourite Chelsea Player Ruben Loftus-Cheek
  • Fan Since 2000

Recent Profile Visitors

814 profile views
  1. Nathan

    Not more than you going on about the typos. I hope you go about asking all of them what exactly their typos mean. Nothing would beat that mate, can't wait. Maybe I should start making OTT and nonsensical post about "net spend" even though no football club has that as a measure for it's transfer dealings 😂.
  2. Nathan

    No need to leave out the 2 way street argument then?
  3. Nathan

    "Fans" don't go about dissing board at every opportunity and calling players "donkeywater" do they? It's a 2 way street. If you are willing to abuse the players, then you should not have problem accepting some hard comments. Or you can just show respect if you want it. Typos amuse you, good to know. Lol. And interesting.
  4. 24. Reece James

    So happy for him and the club. Great news. Now we should get Tammy done. Btw, who all have we tied long term? RLC, Reece, mount, Cho. The core and spine seems to be taking shape.
  5. Nathan

    Hmmm. True just because one confuses buckets and brackets because English is not the first language should definitely not be speaking their minds. Anyways, don't need your advice. I will speak my mind soecially when someone acts like know-it-alls while clearly they have no idea about it or how the finances work. Also, I have written my points to support the board. Do you have anything to say to that, or do you just go around being a grammar nazi?
  6. Nathan

    Villa are paying his wages in full. Burnley paid half of his as per reports. So what's that? A total of 2.5m. Again, that makes it whole "loss" on the books as 10.5mil. which would mean we would have had to find some team to buy DD for 13.5 m. Best of luck finding that. I am sure a genius in transfers who has no actual fucking background in finance or scouting could definitely have got that deal done, right? Yes, the whole DD transfer had a poor ring to it from the start, but you don't self combust and make more stupid decision. You try to somehow mitigate it, which the board is trying to do. Understand that. I know it will be hard for an idiot, who considers themselves as a know-it-all to "understand" but it's never too late. For every DD their is an azpi, gc, Eden, Costa, cesc, matic, mats etc etc. Where we have bought well and sold well. We have a net spend of 100m in the last 5 seasons, arsenal have 240 and United upwards of 500. We are ahead of both of them. Along with that, we have now become self sufficient and have shown profits in 3 of the last 5 seasons. So the FACTS show that OvERALL the board has done a good job (not just one or 2 individual transfers). So I personally would consider all of these facts rather than stupid ramblings and rantings and honestly, the same shitty posts again and again of an idiot regarding the board
  7. Nathan

    "drinkwater" (last time I checked that was his name) was bought for 40m in 2017. Which means at the start of this summer, 24mil of his fee was still left to on our books. If we kept him, we got a loss of 8mil of his value (considering we did not pay his wages). If we sold him for even 15m we Got a loss of 24-15 = 9mil on our books and that is considering literally anyone would have even paid 15m for him. And that's the difference between people on the board who actually know what they are doing and then on the other end of the spectrum are idiots and assholes trying to prove to the world that they actually know everything about something that they clearly have 0 idea about. There is a reason these "fans" are sitting behind a screen trying to earn brownie points out of fellow "fan" while there are those doing the real thing and making the club self sustainable in a very very short period of time. I for one know who I will put my trust in, and it won't be the idiots for sure.
  8. Nathan

    As much as we would like to pretend that it's not, I am sure even 1m/2m is a lot of money, even for a mega football club like Chelsea. Yes, Kennedy also lies in the same bucket, but there is also the problem of the player accepting the contract. Kenedy might be asking for wages which the club think might make any transfer of his unachievable. I am not saying I know it all, but I also find it difficult and ridiculous to believe that the board of one of the biggest clubs in the world is getting everything wrong (according to some fans on here), where as the truth is that within a span of 5 years, we have become a club which used to be working on whatever change and scrap we could get from RoMan's pockets to one which is self sufficient now (a profit of 5m over the course of last 5 seasons) compared to a loss of around 100+ mil in 5 years before that period. So don't believe the rants of one particular poster on here who is continuously ridiculing the board. They are doimg a decent job. As for the new loan rule. It's now official as of yet, is it? Even if it was, Nathan's loan is a 6 month loan, which makes his transfer in the summer quite viable.
  9. Nathan

    Why is it ridiculous? Care to explain? His contract was up in 6 months, we would have got nothing for him. In this way he is barely on our books (bought back in 2014 for a meagre 4mil, so his amortized value would be in thousands literally) and i am sure mineiro would be paying his wages. So where is the loss exactly? In this way if we sell him next year, his profit will be recorded on our 20/21 financial books when we would actually be needing the money to buy players, rather than the 19/20 books where we already have the hazard and the rest sales as well as we dont look to be buying anyone. So I think this is good business by the board. Obviously the doom and gloom merchants and the "we know better than the board" brigade would have you believe otherwise, but believe me, this is a decent thing that the board has done.
  10. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    This. People have no actual idea of how anything actually works and yet try to come out looking like big shots and dissing on the board.
  11. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    On the other hand, we are not pressing the panic button and getting things done in a lot better way.
  12. Chelsea's Transfer Targets

    I would like that.
  13. Newcastle 1-0 Chelsea

    Not an easy game from any stretch of imagination. They are well set up, well disciplined and know how to play against the big boys. Drew against city, Drew against wolves, won against United at home. Will be a tough game.
  14. Chelsea 3-0 Burnley

    Happy bday bro
  15. 9. Tammy Abraham

    Lolololololol